Deceptive Patterns
‹ All enforcement USA

United States of America v. MyLife.com, Inc., and Jeffrey Tinsley

Jurisdiction
USA
Authority
United States District Court Central District of California, Western Division
Date
15 Dec 2021
Case number
2:20-cv-06692-JFW-PD
Outcome
$21 million in fines

Case summary

MyLife.com was held liable for luring consumers in hard-to-cancel subscription programs and deceptive billing practices.

Our analysis

Outcome

In the settlement, Tinsley and MyLife have agreed to separate judgments totaling $33.9 million, with Tinsley responsible for paying $5 million and MyLife paying a partially suspended judgment of $16 million due to financial constraints. These funds will be allocated for consumer refunds. MyLife will be obligated to pay the full remaining amount of the judgment if its financial misrepresentation is confirmed. Additionally, Tinsley and MyLife are permanently prohibited from offering products with negative option features and engaging in deceptive practices as outlined in the complaint, which includes misleading implications regarding individuals' criminal records in cases of traffic violations. Furthermore, MyLife is mandated to implement a monitoring program to ensure compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

Parties

Federal Trade Commission, MyLife.com, Inc., and Jeffrey Tinsley